|
Main
Page
Graduate
Program
Undergraduate
Program
Course Information
Course
Web Pages
Our
Research
Research
Areas
Technical
Reports
Faculty
Graduate
Students
Research
and Technical Staff
Administrative
Staff
Alumni
Degree
Recipients
Calendars
Computing
Facilities
CS
Talks Mailing List
Yale
Computer Science FAQ
Yale Workstation Support
Computing
Lab
AfterCollege
Job Resource
Contact
Us
History
Life in the Department
Life About Town
Directions
Faculty
Positions
City
of New Haven
Yale
Applied Mathematics
Yale
C2: Creative Consilience of

Computing and the Arts
Yale
Faculty of Engineering
Yale
GSAS Staff Directory
Yale
University Home Page
Google Search
Yale Info Phonebook
Internal |
|
Knowledge Representation for the Web
Not all of the work in the Center is in the area of hardware agents.
We are also interested in the behavior of software agents which carry
out tasks in abstract spaces such as the World-Wide Web. A major issue
emerging in this area is the format of "metadata" or data about
the content of web pages and other sources of information and computation.
Such metadata must be expressed in formal languages, and will be useless
unless standard languages that many different agents can process with
reasonable efficiency are developed. Drew
McDermott and his students are focusing on the issues that arise in
this area.
A classic trade-off in representation systems is between expressivity
and tractability. The more that can be said in a representation system,
the harder it is to figure out what a particular expression in the system
is saying. Hence there is pressure to specialize representation systems
to particular domains. For example, the paper industry is likely to develop
a notation for talking about attributes of paper, measurements of paper
volume, ordering procedures for batches of paper, and so forth; while
the real-estate industry develops notations for properties of houses,
bidding systems, negotiation procedures, and so forth. Standards are now
being hammered out for making sure that these notations share at least
the same syntactic framework. The dominant syntax is likely to be XML,
the eXtensible Markup Language. But work on semantics is still in its
infancy. The need for coherent semantics is likely to become more urgent
for two reasons: There may well be legal consequences of providing unclear
metadata; and there will be serious interoperability problems as agents
that speak different languages try to communicate. The main thrust of
McDermotts group is on translation techniques that address the second
of these looming problems, but developing these techniques inevitably
involves clarifying fundamental semantic issues.

|
 |